I. Introduction to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS)

The Common Reporting Standard (CRS), developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2014, is a global initiative for the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) on financial accounts. Its core purpose is to combat tax evasion and enhance global tax transparency by requiring financial institutions to report financial information about account holders to their tax authorities, who then exchange this data internationally. Over 120 countries have committed to this standard through the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA). The information exchanged includes identifying details of reportable persons and financial account specifics like balances and income. [1]  

While inspired by the United States’ Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), CRS differs significantly. FATCA primarily targets US persons, whereas CRS is a multilateral standard for exchange among all participating jurisdictions. The US does not participate in CRS, relying instead on FATCA, which creates distinct compliance considerations for entities with multi-jurisdictional interests.

‍

II. Understanding Non-Financial Entities (NFEs) under CRS

Under CRS, entities are classified as either Financial Institutions (FIs) or Non-Financial Entities (NFEs). FIs (e.g., banks, investment entities) have direct reporting obligations. NFEs, on the other hand, are entities not defined as FIs and are further categorized as Active or Passive. Examples include operating businesses, professional firms, and charitable organizations.  

Accurate NFE classification is crucial, as it determines the due diligence and reporting obligations of financial institutions. Misclassification is a common error that can lead to penalties and scrutiny for Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs). For passive NFEs, financial institutions must "look through" the entity to identify and report the tax residence of controlling persons. Conversely, for Active NFEs, UBOs are generally not reported for automatic exchange purposes. This distinction is central to CRS's aim to prevent tax evasion through passive investment vehicles. [2]  

‍

III. Is Your Company an Active NFE? The 8 Criteria Explained

An entity is an "Active NFE" if it meets any of the following eight criteria, which cover a broad range of legitimate economic and social functions [3]:

1. Income and Assets Test: Less than 50% of gross income is passive, AND less than 50% of assets produce passive income. (e.g., a local garage, hairdressers, construction firms).

1. Publicly Traded NFE: Stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, or it's a related entity of such a company.  
2. Governmental Entities, International Organisations, Central Banks, or Wholly Owned Entities: The NFE falls into one of these categories or is wholly owned by one or more of them.  
3. Holding NFE (Nonfinancial Group): Primarily holds stock of, or provides financing/services to, non-FI subsidiaries and does not function as an investment fund.  
4. Start-up NFE: Not yet operating but investing capital to operate a non-FI business (exception applies for up to 24 months from organization).  
5. NFEs Liquidating or Emerging from Bankruptcy: Not an FI in the past five years and is liquidating or reorganizing to recommence a non-FI business.  
6. Treasury Centres (Nonfinancial Group): Primarily engages in financing/hedging for non-FI Related Entities within a non-FI group.  
7. Non-Profit NFE: Established and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, or similar purposes, tax-exempt, with no private beneficial interest in income/assets, and specific distribution restrictions upon liquidation.  

NFE classification is dynamic and requires regular re-evaluation, as criteria can be time-bound or depend on fluctuating income/asset mixes.  

‍

IV. Passive NFEs: Definition, Implications, and UBO Reporting

A Passive NFE is an NFE that does not meet any Active NFE criteria. Typically, it derives over 50% of its gross income from passive sources (e.g., dividends, interest, rent) and holds over 50% of its assets for passive income production. Common examples include holding companies and investment vehicles.  

The classification as a Passive NFE triggers a "look-through" requirement, obligating financial institutions to identify and report information about the entity's "Controlling Persons" (Ultimate Beneficial Owners or UBOs).[4] This is a key anti-tax evasion measure, ensuring transparency for entities used as passive investment vehicles.[5]  

Financial institutions must identify controlling persons (natural persons with ultimate ownership or control, typically >25% ownership). They then determine if these UBOs are "reportable persons" (tax residents of a CRS participating jurisdiction other than where the account is held), primarily via self-certifications. If so, the financial institution reports specific identifying information for each reportable UBO, including name, address, tax residence, TIN, and date of birth.  

Challenges in identifying UBOs include complex ownership chains, verifying self-certifications from high-risk Citizenship/Residence by Investment (CBI/RBI) schemes, and managing discretionary beneficiaries of trusts. Clients must provide accurate self-certifications and notify financial institutions of changes in circumstances, as misrepresentation can lead to penalties or accounts being treated as "non-responder".  

‍

V. Strategic Use of DIFC SPVs and Foundations for Risk Isolation

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) offers Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) and Foundations for asset protection and risk isolation. While providing robust legal frameworks, their CRS implications must be understood.

DIFC Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs): Asset Ring-Fencing and Risk Mitigation

DIFC SPVs (Prescribed Companies) are designed to ring-fence assets and liabilities, functioning as passive holding companies for asset protection. [6] They are restricted from commercial operations or hiring employees. DIFC's common law framework provides a secure foundation for SPV structures, useful for purposes like aviation/maritime structures, crowdfunding, intellectual property, and structured financing. Benefits include tax efficiency, global market access, and quick setup. However, due to their passive nature, DIFC SPVs will most likely be classified as Passive NFEs under CRS, triggering UBO reporting obligations for their controlling persons.  

DIFC Foundations: Enhanced Asset Protection and Succession Planning

DIFC Foundations are legal entities combining corporate and trust principles, where the foundation itself legally and beneficially owns assets. Key features for asset protection include separate legal personalities, ring-fencing of assets from the founder's personal ownership, and enhanced privacy (founders and beneficiaries are not on the public register). They also offer no forced heirship under English common law and clear governance for succession planning.  

Similar to SPVs, DIFC Foundations are entities subject to CRS classification. Given their asset-holding nature, they are highly likely to be classified as Passive NFEs, necessitating the identification and reporting of their controlling persons (Founder, Council members, Guardian, Beneficiaries).  

It is crucial to understand that while DIFC structures offer local privacy and legal segregation, the CRS framework mandates international transparency, especially for Passive NFEs. Therefore, the benefit of these structures lies in robust legal ring-fencing and governance, not international tax secrecy. Their use must be integrated with an overall international tax compliance strategy.  

‍

VI. Common Reporting Standard: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

General CRS Questions

• Why do financial institutions need to comply with CRS? They are legally obligated in participating jurisdictions to collect and report tax details of account holders to local tax authorities, who then exchange this information internationally.  
• Which countries are party to CRS? Over 120 countries have committed to CRS. The OECD maintains an updated list.  
• What specific information will be reported under CRS? Identifying information (name, address, TIN, date/place of birth) for reportable persons, account number, reporting financial institution details, and financial data like account balances, interest, and dividends.  
• Will any amounts be deducted or withheld under CRS? No, CRS is purely an information exchange standard; no deductions or withholdings are required.  

‍

NFE Classification and Reporting FAQs

What is the difference between an Active NFE and a Passive NFE?

An Active NFE conducts active trade/business and meets one of eight criteria, while a Passive NFE primarily earns passive investment income and does not meet Active NFE criteria.  

‍

Why is NFE classification important?

It dictates financial institutions' reporting obligations. Passive NFEs trigger a "look-through" rule, requiring UBO reporting, unlike Active NFEs.  

‍

Is CRS classification the same as FATCA classification?

Not always; there are key differences, and an entity may be classified differently under each regime.

‍

UBO Reporting FAQs

What is a "Controlling Person" (UBO) under CRS?

The natural person(s) who ultimately own or control an entity, typically through direct/indirect ownership (>25% vote/value) or other means of control. For trusts/foundations, this includes settlors, trustees, protectors, council members, guardians, and certain beneficiaries.  

‍

When are Controlling Persons reported under CRS?

Only when the entity account holder is classified as a Passive NFE.  

‍

What information about a Controlling Persons is reported?

The information that is reported includes the name, residence address, the jurisdiction(s) of tax residence, TIN, date of birth, and the specific "controlling person type".

‍

How do I determine my tax residency?

Tax residency rules are complex and jurisdiction-specific. Financial institutions cannot provide tax advice; clients should consult a professional tax advisor or official OECD/national tax authority guidance.  

‍

What if my circumstances change (e.g., change of address or tax residency)?

Clients must promptly notify their financial institution of any changes, as this impacts information disclosed to tax authorities. New self-certifications will be required. 

What if I do not provide the requested CRS self-certification or supporting documents?

Failure to provide required information may prevent financial institutions from processing requests or lead to reporting the client as a "non-responder" to tax authorities.  

‍

VII. Conclusion: Navigating CRS Compliance

The Common Reporting Standard has established a new era of global tax transparency. Understanding the distinction between Active and Passive Non-Financial Entities (NFEs) is paramount, as Passive NFEs trigger mandatory "look-through" reporting of Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs). This is a deliberate mechanism to prevent wealth concealment through opaque structures.

Clients must embrace this transparency. Accurate self-certifications and timely updates on tax residency and ownership structures are critical. While structures like DIFC SPVs and Foundations offer robust legal frameworks for asset protection and local privacy, they are likely to be classified as Passive NFEs under CRS, meaning UBOs will be reported internationally. Their value lies in legal segregation and governance, not international tax secrecy.

Given the complexities, consulting qualified legal and tax advisors is highly recommended. Professional guidance ensures accurate entity classification, UBO identification, and strategic structuring, enabling effective compliance within the transparent CRS framework.